I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy…Gestalt Consciousness gives you a cool -20% to War Exhaustion. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Why am I not. The reason you need to occupy all the planets in systems you claimed to Enforce War Goals is that the game enforces a penalty for unoccupied systems and planets, which looks something like: planet (-10), system (-100). You can only be forced to accept a white peace, which would have resulted in gains for you. To be fair, bubbles is indeed precious, and I deserve death for letting them die. You can surrender to them, you can't surrender to the planes flying over because they can't then immediately try to secure the area. 631. I always had to wait till both sides have 100% of War Exhaustion. Status Quo can be enforced by either side as soon as 24 months have passed since the opposing side reached 100% war exhaustion, and if both sides reach 100% war exhaustion, the Status Quo is enforced automatically after 24. A party can only force a status quo peace 720 days after the OTHER party reached 100% war exhaustion. CryptoWar Exhaustion is a very mundane and isolated mechanic that only serves ends up making wars last longer than they really should, and can sometimes end a war right before you're ready to end it, creating a frustrating experience. After invading every planet and capturing all their systems the war ends with status quo. War Exhaustion has no effect at all outside being a counter until your opponent can force Status Quo peace, so disabling than option effectively removes the entire system. #1. You need to stack enough positive modifiers (enemy war exhaustion, occupation, and relative fleet power) to overpower it - or take a status quo instead. Maybe just crack their home planet to fully demoralize the survivors. I am using the base game. so I have achieved all my war goals the enemy have nothing, all systems occupied by me war exhaustion is 20% 40% and rising like 1% per year nothing else happens, at this rate it will take another 60 years before this AI "morons" finaly surrenderAn empire declared war on a large fanatic purifier empire. The whole galaxy joined and we stomped the enormous FP empire. In comparison, my exhaustion totals 28%. The war ends faster if the loss is acceptable, and more so if you have a solid hold over all your war goals. Your ally, not you, was the war leader and he forced. Personally I'm frustrated by the fact that I can cap an AI's war exhaustion and can't force their surrender. Disclaimer: I don't have Nemesis and Overlord + no mods installed. step 3 : start taking systems with your flees and put your army right behind him. g. War exhaustion contributes a bit to it, but is otherwise irrelevant for beating an opponent. Nothing else changes about the war. Slower war exhaustion is part of gestalt consciousness. But when i do, i go full tilt. Your goal is to occupy enough of the enemy's territory that they agree to surrender, before your war exhaustion reaches 100% and the enemy. There are two society techs that offers reduced claim costs + reduced war exhaustion, I think it's a T2 and a T3, though it might be a T3 and a T4. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. The arbitrary 2 year limit can also render allies useless, as a war can hit 100 war exhaustion and then 2 years pass before the allies can even GET to the warzone. When a nation in Stellaris goes to war, the players are asked to manage the fleets and the armies and that's it. You get a -100 warscore penalty for demanding a surrender and a -100 penalty for demanding vassalization. If you're invading a heavily fortified enemy you'll take much higher war exhaustion than them, but since you'll be taking systems it doesn't matter if you hit 80% war exhaustion when they're only at 20%—you stand to gain from the war and they stand to lose. I destroy the star fortress and flip it to my side, then I start bombing the two planets. "Unfortunately I don't have a save from before I got ♥♥♥♥♥♥ by the giga empire supporting this small pos colony, I was honestly hoping that because I had 100% war exhaustion that the war would end in 2 years, like the game told me it would before, but the game continued to let the giga empire ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ me for a sold. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. Ships 'destroyed' this way cause 5x war exhaustion. 1. 75% of systems plus 75% war exhaustion would work). 11. Unless they changed it, war exhaustion cannot force you to surrender, it can only force you to white peace. Waging wars in Stellaris ever since the CB system was added was not exactly fun. Usually I find they won't accept due to demanding unoccupied systems/planets. I decided to vassalise some roaches to steal their ring world, so I declare war on the roaches and their 1 ally. He has no shipyards left - only 5 star bases, which he all built during the war. [district id] effect add_planet. I don't want to go to war with the AI Federation. Once it hits 100% War Exhaustion, there's no reason for it to -not- throw hundreds of ships away in an effort to blow up one or two corvettes. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Ships 'destroyed' this way cause 5x war exhaustion. More seriously though and less trolly, yeah, I'm not really liking the fact that it autosurrenders without an accept/deny window like in EU4. Business, Economics, and Finance. The AI doesn't have to surrender at 100% War Exhaustion either. Look under the war goal and it should say their current acceptance of it and why. Militarists have no effect on war exhaustion. Is anyone else finding it difficult to raise the war exhaustion of the enemy? I went to war with an empire that had less ships and far less tech. Eventually its +100 from exhaustion so still -50. This means that territories etc will all be reversed back to their pre-war status. I have NO DLC and this is my fourth or fifth game War score is how badly you beat them, war exhaustion is their will to keep fighting. They won't accept defeat when I offer them the achieve war goals option, because I've claimed every system in their empire and it reduces their. War exhaustion is not a measure of success or 'winning'. If you occuppy 90% of the required claims and won 90% of the battles that should be considered a win in my book, and if you lose 1 battle it shouldn't lead to an immediate forced white peace. The speed at which War Exhaustion accumulates is influenced by factors such as ethics, traditions, technology and the amount of claims being pressed - an empire that is fighting to hold onto a handful of border systems will tire of a costly conflict quicker than one whose very. Even tho I’m running laps around their alliance, I can’t win. "Blowing up all their planets is good fun, but if you really want them to suffer, you should conquer them the conventional way and mark their species for slavery or extermination. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Yes, but only for the final stage, or if the Galactic Community declares a preemptive crisis war. You refuse the offer because you are sure you can conquer all it's planets and systems. A Status Quo Peace is you get to keep whatever claimed systems you hold. Like, I've captured every single starbase, occupied every single planet, blown every single navy into so much stardust, but the opposing government - presumably now based directly beneath a mountain of my occupying soldiers - fundamentally refuses to surrender, because five seconds before the war broke out they signed a defensive pact with a one. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. Pact with managed to anger a Fallen Empire and dragged myself and my vassals into war as a result. On the other hand if your navy has equal strength you need to both have taken all systems and the enemy. If a third party is holding some of the systems you want, this means you won't be able to declare total victory, but you can at least get the claimed systems and planets. They can. Impose Ideology is -100; Humiliate is -50; Conquer scales with the amounts of claims you have. Capture everything, and do it fast. Remember to fully occupy every claimed system and planet before you do so. Thats surprising given the design goal was specifically made to account for this. Story/rant time: I declare war on an awakened empire and absolutely stomp their entire fleet, their war exhaustion shoots up to 70 while mine is only at 20. Don't think of war exhaustion as an estimator of winning/losing, war exhaustion if. I have had this bug in original release but not since 1. Y'can call it exhaustion if you want, against skynet its not exhaustion, it's just a timer. If I reach high war exhaustion with a federation for example, but I only destroyed maybe 2 out of 5 members and the rest are untouched, they can force my surrender. A system where offering surrender lowered your War Exhaustion (on a time limit) and refusing enemy surrender increased it would also go a long way towards preventing the 'griefing' style of play that people were so worried about when forced peace was (thankfully) removed. I win every space battle. 100% war exhaustion is -100% stability Then multiply together effects from multiple wars. 86 votes, 20 comments. War exhaustion is just a bad status quo mechanic. Declare War, invade system Take the outpost without a single ship lost and sit there with my fleet, ready to settle the war with my war goals achieved (the claim of this single system) - My enemy is a militarist xenophobe and just sits with his. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. well then its still a bug, cuz what has happened is taking over 100% of there planets and gaining all the Exhaustion and they got none. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. In Stellaris you loose no ships, take no damage, business is booming, you're maxed out on all resources, you have no enemy ships to fight, you still get war exhaustion. WTF War Exhaustion. But if you're fully occupying some of their systems that you claimed, you're still going to "win" the war - you'll get a bunch of. Always occupy then status quo by driving enemy war exhaustion to 100. But it’s not likely. ago. I'm a new player with 11 hours so far. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. EU4 peace deals are so much better. Since AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. If the game says you are demanding unoccupied planets or systems, it is correct in that regard. If one side has 100%, a countdown starts and at the end of it the other side can force peace. As most of us know, war exhaustion in Stellaris is little more than a timer that eventually force empires to sign a white…Here's the exhaustion details: Attrition: 14%. I could not select the force surrender option, even when they had 0 star bases and all planets were occupied. when you can occupy everything but still lose. As the game goes on, empires accumulate tech and traditions that lower the accumulation rate for war exhaustion meaning the wars will drag on longer. 100% war exhaustion doesn't mean the state that's at it can make peace. It takes 10 days for armies in orbit to land on a world. 100% war exhaustion means you used up what your country considers to be an okay amount of resources for war. If you look closely, there is a small separation between the bottom of the War Exhaustion box and the Occupation tracker. #2. Resulting in the common situation that even tho your fleet can destroy the enemy easily, you are forced to surrender and give up the territories you coundt reach in time. if you click those you can open up the war screen itself and. They have 2 planets left and I'm occupying both of them. 12. Don't fleet stack. The war exhaustion system in stellaris is quite different. 181. Also, exhaustion doesn't matter that much. Your perfect start is ruined, you got the Irassians yet again. Any time a ground unit is lost. Especially if deployed for the years that a Stellaris war goes for. An amazing starting area with great habitable planets, a perfect choke point, no nearby powerhouses to threaten you. I was forced to surrender a humiliation war with two systems untouched, so i assumed the player was playing under the same rules as the AI on this. War Exhaustion trigger percent: 40%. Warscore is 211 to 8. Can someone please explain me the war exhaustion? I already played 2 games and in both, an empire declares war on me with at least 6 claims (+/-). When a war side's War Exhaustion hits 100%, they can be forced into a Status Quo peace (more on this below). Been playing Stellaris since release, but recently came back after a long break. 1% reduction. ago. Systems occupied by this side will be immediately ceded, making cede_claims and release_occupied_systems_on_status_quo fields irrelevant. It takes 10 days for armies in orbit to land on a world. 113. You could give one or even both empires alloys. Also in that example, the enemy had 100% exhaustion, the AI can still refuse to surrender to your claims with the subjugation war. If on defense you can setup defenses so that you can force it higher over time so the opposition must white peace. :) Remember we're always looking for more suggestions and constructive criticism:. War exhaustion is only how close your nation is close to calling it quits. I didn't lose a single ship. I am waging a war for claims as my. 1. because when you reach 100% war exhaustion its not automatic surrender, its forced status quo, as such since your ally didn't demand a status quo they did not end the conflict but regardless a surrender outcome only occurs if you conquer entirely, you can see this from trying to complete war goals when at war, a conquer casus belli is only possi. edit: Actually, missphrased that: To ENFORCE a surrender, you need to have 100% occupation. Since AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. Now type surrender <crisis empire id> <war id>. ok, so I will admit, i am a noob to this game, got it only 2 days ago, but ive lerned the basics and have been winning wars. Yet, Stellaris decided that they get almost no war exhaustion and I can't. My war exhaustion is at like 13% for both sides. That’s what happens in stellaris. (because war). Reply. The last one technology is a technology that reduces your fatigue by 10% and is extremely useful. r/Stellaris. 100% war exhaustion alone isn't enough to get the enemy to capitulate, but it does give a +100 modifier to the calculations used by the AI to decide when to surrender. I think there should be no passive attrition, it should only comes with some factors:-having systems occupied by the enemy-having a resource decreasing-having a resource at 0 Also, any fix to alliance War Exhaustion has to ensure that the 1v1 wars are not affected. Two years after the war exhaustion reaches 100% for either side, the other side can force the war to end in a Status Quo Peace. You are in a race if you want to conquer someone in a single go. Pro tip: never, ever expect a surrender, never assume the other side will surrender and never surrender yourself if it loses planets. The way stellaris war exhaustion works is "Our arbitrary meter was crossed , now you need to sue for unconditional surrender. Everything is glorious. After that, I jump to their capital planets to cut off their production. I'm on good terms with them and they're huge. But in theory if not one of the empires sue for peace it could go on. This is actually an issue with the AI (second empire totally passive in the war), not the exhaustion mechanic. not my favorite thing in Stellaris. No you don't understand I think- the war doesn't have to end in a surrender. War exhaustion exists solely to force an end to wars, so the losing empire can recover. That's how we lost the Vietnam war, too. Cannot surrender or status quo unless you reach 100% exhaustion. -----3) Disengage and Emergency Retreat While these are technically combat mechanics, they certainly play a role considering how crucial 1) is. AI will never surrender to a total war war goal even if. - Never surrender (-25%) Also the first tech is just a tier 2, you can get it very early:. But no, they just give 0. As for getting the surrender. Business, Economics, and Finance. So I'm in a war with this one empire, and they won't surrender. If you wish to be closer to RL then after having a high war exhaustion you should have penalties equalling a percentage of your total income. But if you are at 5% attrition or 80% does not make a difference. Once their war exhaustion reaches 100%, you can force a status quo peace. I don't want to go to war with the AI Federation. Meanwhile, the winner will usually get to 100% war exhaustion more slowly so he gets the ability to force peace at an opportunate moment first. Report. However even several years after reaching 100% exhaustion they will stagnate at -39 Acceptance to surrender. Jump to latest Follow Reply. War Exhaustion is just a clock. 25 Now 0. 5 x (Naval Capacity Lost / (Total Naval Capacity+100))13 votes, 13 comments. If you're fighting to save your home and loved ones, you'll be much less inclined to surrender no matter the cost. Do note, if you have claims against them, when they surrender, they won't be subjugated. Honestly the mechanic isn't exactly perfect. No one, neither player nor AI is forced to surrender because of. There is actually something to be said for paying attention to the game giving you a red warning flag. Reaching the war exhaustion threshold of 20 (100) in a war will incur some minor. You were NOT the war leader. 1 aspect I'm missing or seems counter intuitive to me is the war exhaustion mechanic. However I saw no way to change my war goals. In addition, whenever one side in a conflict reaches 100% war exhaustion the other will be able to force a Status Quo after 24 months. One thing Stellaris really needs to do is give you a way to get a list of unoccupied claims (especially if you have. I did lose 40 capacity's worth of ships, but that's it. The arbitrary 2 year limit can also render allies useless, as a war can hit 100 war exhaustion and then 2 years pass before the allies can even GET to the warzone. Groud Battles: 0% (killing defensive armies doesn't matter I guess) Occupation: 24%. Crisis empires get the -75% war exhaustion bonus at stage two, when they can still wage normal wars and well before triggering the galaxy-wide total war. Usually if. This is especially true in the case of wars of conquest, in which it is possible to get everything you want out of the war even if you are forced to accept a status quo peace. And the fact war exhaustion ticks up means that it's actually possible to put enough armies on a planet to make a literally unconquerable planet. pathetic across the bored with no fleets. In this case, the target empire had no navy when I declared war (they lost it in an earlier war vs a Holy Guardian - hence my decision to pounce on them!), so I've just been keeping them at bay each time they "poke" at my front lines with larger and larger fleets whilst keeping their defensive-pact "allies" in a strategic stalemate (my plan is. NuclearKiwix • 1 yr. Also the fact that claims and capitol dont have very much weight in comparison. War exhaustion should be an empire modifier rather than a war score knockoff. Losing a destroyer creates twice as much as a corvette, a cruiser 4x, etc. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. The lack of negotiated peace settlements make the 'wack a mole' nature of warfare really bad, because making the AI surrender is completely out of the question unless you utterly crush them (-300 for demanding unoccupied planets, lol) and surrender is the only war goal where the enemy doesn't get it's currently occupied claims, so you have. PlutonArioch Dec 10, 2022 @ 11:29pm. It will make them accept any status quo peace you offer (in wich you would get the terriotries you have claims on AND occupy militarily, so often a white peace is a way better option to end a war then going. If you slap penalties on 100% war exhaustion, the smaller, losing side will accrue those penalties for the majority of the war's duration since they normally reach 100% WE very quickly due to, well, losing the war. . If you have ten corvettes each ship lost is 10% exhaustion added for each lost, if you have 100 each corvette lost is only 1% war exhaustion. If you slap penalties on 100% war exhaustion, the smaller, losing side will accrue those penalties for the majority of the war's duration since they normally reach 100% WE very quickly due to, well, losing the war. To actually force surrender, you would have to occupy literally their entire empire, plus all of their allies in the war. So if you're willing (and able) to hold the territory and wait for them to reach 100% exhaustion you can force Status Quo, but that could take quite some time. It has no bearing on actual victory, other than providing an 'out' so that the. Status Quo can be enforced by either side as soon as 24 months have passed since the opposing side reached 100% war exhaustion, and if both sides reach 100% war exhaustion, the Status Quo is enforced automatically after 24. PlutonArioch Dec 10, 2022 @ 11:29pm. . My war exhaustion is at like 13% for both sides. Same thing can happen with 2 players. They were at 100% war Exhaustion I was at like 30% So lets end this war. Stellaris. But then you see the dreaded pop up. Because sometimes they don't even build ships. War Exhaustion is increased by destroying their fleets, as well as steadily over time. BUT only a status quo can be forced, not a surrender!I've noticed something in the game I'm in. You have the perfect start. No-one else is at war with any of the federation members including the Ovarians. 100% exhaustion means that side is liable to be forced to a status quo if the other side wishes to, anytime. If you look at every historical scenario ever, losing Battle after Battle, failing to attack as the aggressor, and losing copius amounts of manpower and ships causes the aggressor to want to sue for peace, whereas when a defender actually, oh I don't know, defends their. This of course means that they have some rebellion within. For example: I had times where I was at 100% War Exhaustion but the war went on, because the AI didn't want to make peace yet. Destroying the enemy's entire fleet only gets you. Originally posted by FIBBIDEH: After you reach 100% war exhaustion, after 2 years a status quo can be forced on you. I have gathered 27% exhaustion for 11 ships lost, 0% due to 5 armies lost, they have gathered 22% due to 67 ships lost, and 0% due to 141 armies lost. The effect that has varies based on your war goals. 24 months after you hit 100% exhaustion, you can be forced into Status Quo. 01. On the other hand if your navy has equal strength you need to both have taken all systems and the enemy. It can be useful for him, too. You understood wrong. With no ability to force Status Quo, the war will continue until one side achieves their War Goals, or is entirely eradicated. Below is my. • 3 yr. The war has been going on for about 2 years now, but our enemies reached 100% exhaustion quite awhile ago, and are not surrendering. Also, any fix to alliance War Exhaustion has to ensure that the 1v1 wars are not affected. Not really. It usually says why they won't capitulate. War exhaustion in Stellaris is just a mechanic to prevent foreverwars between the AI and the player exploiting the AI through war too. War exhaustion represents your population’s willingness to continue fighting. we got tired of his shit and decided to go to war and split him up and lock his empire into a single system. Whenever i attack someone, my war exhaustion builds up much faster than them, even if im getting all my claimed systems and that being my wargoal. Don't think of war exhaustion as an estimator of winning/losing, war exhaustion if it was to be broken down to its fundamental functionality, it is a timer, when this timer reaches its end the war can now be forced to end for the side that reached it. This is then used to determine when one side will surrender and how much the winner can demand of them. That allows the attacker to force a status quo after 2 years. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. The only way to force surrender is to do what you have claimed to have done: Occupy everything the opposing side owns (including allies if they have any). Are the AI empires not forced into surrendering after 2 years at 100% War Exhaustion? No. Right now I am destroying this empire in an attempt to vassalize, I have occupied all their planets, and checked to make sure twice. 100% war exhaustion alone isn't enough to get the enemy to capitulate, but it does give a +100 modifier to the calculations used by the AI to decide when to surrender. And when I'm trying to advance to invade planet the AI keeps spamming those infinite mercenaries fleets that force me to split my fleets in two fronts. 3+ fleets. CryptoHey! So, wars in stellaris work pretty differently from most games (only similar to other paradox games). 5 # Multiplier of war exhaustion gained from ships- Was 2. I cannot win even if I do occupy all their space and planets. I am totally crushing them. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. You can win a war with 100% war exhaustion while your opponent is at 1%. That’s what happens in stellaris. " I feel like this is a solid change. The war exhaustion information is always accurate, but working out where the war exhaustion comes from can be essentially impossible in all but the most straight forward engagements. I find. Now the difference is, you need to claim and control with status quo, if the ennemy surrender, you get all the claim. Problem is having max war exhaustion cause unrest isn't really tenable with the way the game works now. " I feel like this is a solid change. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. 2. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. -----3) Disengage and Emergency Retreat While these are technically combat mechanics, they certainly play a role considering how crucial 1) is. War Exhaustion isn't a measure of who is winning. Think of Russia during WWII; they fought on despite taking massive losses. The AI gets massive war exhaustion reduction cheats which is why when you’re fighting a xenophobic slaving empire that wants to use your colonial population as a workforce even if no fighting ever happens, you’ll reach 100% before them and probably by quite a margin at higher difficulties. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. (by your opponent) And 24 months after your opponent hits 100% exhaustion, your opponent can be forced into Status Quo (by you, but that nearly never comes up because the AI always accepts at 100% itself). I have completely occupied the main targets space and I mean there is literally not a single system or star that they have control over, their fleet is removed and my main fleets are on their way to blitzkrieg their ally aswell. trueBasically you get exhaustion from ship losses in proportion to the number of fleet points worth of ships lost in comparison to your fleet cap. War Exhaustion is just a clock. . Use a race with modifiers to war exhaustion. . But ok fine. Wasn't a total war, just subjugate. 4100 war exhaustion means that they can request a Status Quo - not that you have to surrender. Although in EU4 they have the war exhaustion mechanic which means that you'll have to sign a peace treaty eventually, while in Stellaris, there really isn't anythinhg like that. so. You were NOT the war leader. . . 100% War Exhaustion allows you to force an enemy to accept a Status Quo. 3. 400K subscribers in the Stellaris community. Can someone please explain me the war exhaustion? I already played 2 games and in both, an empire declares war on me with at least 6 claims (+/-). (though the murderous empire should be able to be exausted into surrender). 1 Giltiriel • 5 yr. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. I am a pacifistic player. Our federation had 90% war weariness by the time they were at 50%. After that, I jump to their capital planets to cut off their production. About the first three years, the enemy's war weariness has reached 100%, and I think he will surrender automatically after two or three years, as written in the wiki. Forum listWar Exhaustion doesn't mean you have to surrender. empire A & C are fighting, but empire B is in the way, and has closed borders to both sides, making combat impossible) Stellaris doesn't need war exhaustion to be 100 to enforce the demand for surrenderunlike other Paradox's games. Its purpose is to shut down wars early so early wars won't trade too much away while late wars are quick affairs. You actually reached 100% war exhaustion and didn't notice it. So you can see how you get situations like the OP where the AI fights this massive, decimating battle and seems to get no war exhaustion from it. Just set reasonable war goals and go for those. soontir fel Jul 25, 2022 @ 8:49pm. If you go to the negotiate page, try. The war exhaustion is gained based on the cumulative losses sustained on a percentage basis. I have completely occupied the main targets space and I mean there is literally not a single system or star that they have control over, their fleet is removed and my main fleets are on their way to blitzkrieg their ally aswell. It would be more like the British occupying every town in the 13 colonies, eradicating the American armies to the LAST man and occupying the capital while the Americans still don’t surrender because they got the french supporting them. A war of aggression was declared against me by an empire south of me (Nharr Empire). All wars except those of independence have a negative surrender acceptance, which are countered by factors such as relative navy strength (up to +50),. 0 Now 0. With this, the I would gain 100% exhaustion first and the AI, after 2 years will be able to enforce demands without making any progress. Speaking of using RP to explain certain game mechanics, I think it makes sense that losing troops on planetary defense wouldn't contribute to war exhaustion. 631. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Why am I not. pops feel drained by the mental strain of their telepathic cry for help (flavor text) Possible negative effects after war along with % chance of happening: 20% decreased biological pop resource output-- 30% chance. Remember to fully occupy every claimed system and. There is literally no way for it to fail at that point, until the player grinds through all of the planetary invasions needed to get Occupation up to 51%. #4. Feb 21, 2020;. At that point the status quo peace returns all your planets and systems UNLESS someone has claims on them. There are no other mechanisms tied to it. I've also occupied around 6 planets as part of my goals, Killing 86 of their armies without. Stellaris peace system is about the most unfun peace system of all the paradox strategy games. So, I've declared war on a neighbor hoping to impose my ideology and thus get a new member of the federation I've built. The exhaustion percentage is creeping up so slowly that it will probably be a hundred years before it gets to 100 percent and hopefully the Caloctora will surrender even though the Fallen Empire hasn't done a thing to them. Of course the slowdown of the game and nerf to the ability to build big fleets over the iterations means that its. The number of armies that can be engaged in combat on either side is five plus one-fifth of the planet size. [deposit id] effect add_district =. This means that if you lost 10 out 100 naval capacity worth of ships and the AI lost 20 out of 200 naval capacity. ) It counts as points towards the enemy's willingness to surrender or accept a status quo. and then nothing happened. Nothing happens-- 10% chance. You get a -100 warscore penalty for demanding a surrender and a -100 penalty for demanding vassalization. 5 war exhaustion. I destroy the star fortress and flip it to my side, then I start bombing the two planets. (Future mentions will list the non-scaled amount in parentheses) Every 10 (50) war exhaustion, further gain will be reduced by 5% (scaling multiplicatively), capped at 40. War exhaustion is an iwin button. On the topic of War Score and War Exhaustion. No ships for me to destroy, can't take his 1 planet so we sit there. War exhaustion has two effects: 1. However even several years after reaching 100% exhaustion. Its supposed to help force an end to the war at some point, so you don't spend 40 years fighting over essentially 2 systems, but the forced surrender doesn't seem to effect the AI like it does you. War exhaustion contributes a bit to it, but is otherwise irrelevant for beating an opponent. More confusingly, my enemy has zero war exhaustion from all these battles he has lost. It also gives up to 100 points of War Score.